happy2006
05-20 08:32 PM
We are filing through our lawyer, do we need to give a reason for why we are expediting the process when filing to INS?
wallpaper New iPod Touch 3G (third
ysnraju
12-17 07:30 PM
My PD also wrong. for almost last 2 months I am trying DOL through My attorney That includes so far 8 fax letters requesting the same but no results sofar
smisachu
08-22 04:09 PM
[URL="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1008366"]
Here is the link. Its 194 pages so lets read it and assimilate it. We might be able to use some key points.
Here is the link. Its 194 pages so lets read it and assimilate it. We might be able to use some key points.
2011 iPod touch 64GB
updsoft
09-20 06:25 PM
Hello!
I am in USA since the year 2005 on H1B with company A. I have spent more than 5 years in H1B and during Jan-2010 i changed my status to L1A. Now i have spent nearly 9 months in L1A and a total of 5.9 years in US. Now i am likely to get a job in company B. My questions are :
1. Is it possible for me to change from L1A to H1B again?
2. If it is possible to change from L1A to H1B, Is my 9 months spent on L1A will be added to my H1B quota of 6 six years? (i.e i already spent 5 years in H1B and and 9 months in L1A).
3. If this 9 months is NOT added to my H1 then i am okay but if it is added, will that be a constraint for me to apply for green card in company B. please advise.
thanks
I am in USA since the year 2005 on H1B with company A. I have spent more than 5 years in H1B and during Jan-2010 i changed my status to L1A. Now i have spent nearly 9 months in L1A and a total of 5.9 years in US. Now i am likely to get a job in company B. My questions are :
1. Is it possible for me to change from L1A to H1B again?
2. If it is possible to change from L1A to H1B, Is my 9 months spent on L1A will be added to my H1B quota of 6 six years? (i.e i already spent 5 years in H1B and and 9 months in L1A).
3. If this 9 months is NOT added to my H1 then i am okay but if it is added, will that be a constraint for me to apply for green card in company B. please advise.
thanks
more...
snathan
02-28 11:35 PM
For tax purposes you are resident of state where you reside. For best opinion you can check with the international students center at your school. It is not illegal to attend classes online if your school allows you the option. Again for best advise contact international center they are supposed to guide you to keep your status legal.
What about TVU case?
What about TVU case?
ksvreg
04-06 01:57 PM
My mother scheduled a trip to USA on May 1st. I am concerned about her passport. Her old passport got wet on the borders of the first two and last two pages. VISA was stamped in the old passport which seems to be safe. I do not see any wet appearance on the borders of the VISA page. The old wet passport expired anyway. And she got new one. Will it be safe to travel with these two passport having wet old passport containing VISA stamp? Thanks.
more...
mzdial
July 23rd, 2004, 12:46 AM
I'm not familar with those adapters, but I've read of limited success.. Ranging from focus problems to using them completely as manual focus.
Assess what those lenses are worth now. That EF 28-80mm f/3.5-5.6 is worth $100 or so, new. To be honest, I don't think I would even mount it on a DSLR as the focal range isn't great and it's slow. The Sigma 100-300mm f/4.5-6.7 is worth $125. The same with this Sigma, it's a slow lens. So we are only talking about $225 in lenses, none are really worth trying to convert in my opinion.
Perhaps selling them on Ebay is in order. Buy the D70 with the 18-70 kit lens and your results are going to be much better than trying to use the converted 28-80. You will have focal range overlap anyways, another reason to just avoid trying with this lens.
Nikon sells a similar consumer 70-300mm f/4-5.6 that is faster and would work with the camera for $125. So if you could sell your two lenses and get $125, you would have the kit lens and this low-end zoom and be in much better shape than converting.
Thanks for joining our community.. Hope this helps!
-- Matt
Assess what those lenses are worth now. That EF 28-80mm f/3.5-5.6 is worth $100 or so, new. To be honest, I don't think I would even mount it on a DSLR as the focal range isn't great and it's slow. The Sigma 100-300mm f/4.5-6.7 is worth $125. The same with this Sigma, it's a slow lens. So we are only talking about $225 in lenses, none are really worth trying to convert in my opinion.
Perhaps selling them on Ebay is in order. Buy the D70 with the 18-70 kit lens and your results are going to be much better than trying to use the converted 28-80. You will have focal range overlap anyways, another reason to just avoid trying with this lens.
Nikon sells a similar consumer 70-300mm f/4-5.6 that is faster and would work with the camera for $125. So if you could sell your two lenses and get $125, you would have the kit lens and this low-end zoom and be in much better shape than converting.
Thanks for joining our community.. Hope this helps!
-- Matt
2010 iPod touch 64GB
H1InTrouble
09-18 03:59 PM
Hi,
I am in a situation and hope someone here would be able to provide me with some advice. I was employed by Company A since 2006 and I was working at a Client location for the last 3 years. There is company B who is the primary vendor for the Client. Recently my H1 extension was denied and so I went out of status. I reached out to my end client for help. Since they are happy with my work, they said that they can talk to another vendor (company C) to sponsor a new H1 for me. Company C is now ready to file my H1 but the problem is that Company A somehow got to know about this and is enforcing a non compete agreement on me.
I wanted to know if they can do this even though the H1 was denied and they are unable to provide me with any job. Can they stop me from earning my livelihood. I did not go out and breached any contract, I am trying to move only because my H1 with company A has been denied. The only thing is that the end client is the same.
Regards
H1BInTrouble
I am in a situation and hope someone here would be able to provide me with some advice. I was employed by Company A since 2006 and I was working at a Client location for the last 3 years. There is company B who is the primary vendor for the Client. Recently my H1 extension was denied and so I went out of status. I reached out to my end client for help. Since they are happy with my work, they said that they can talk to another vendor (company C) to sponsor a new H1 for me. Company C is now ready to file my H1 but the problem is that Company A somehow got to know about this and is enforcing a non compete agreement on me.
I wanted to know if they can do this even though the H1 was denied and they are unable to provide me with any job. Can they stop me from earning my livelihood. I did not go out and breached any contract, I am trying to move only because my H1 with company A has been denied. The only thing is that the end client is the same.
Regards
H1BInTrouble
more...
gparr
November 14th, 2004, 07:18 PM
While photographing in the Japanese garden in Portland, OR, I unintentionally captured most, if not all, of the stone lanterns that are dispersed throughout the grounds. Here are my three favorites. More in my gallery. Comments appreciated.
Gary
2 sec. at f/22 and 25mm using the EFS 18-55
http://www.dphoto.us/forumphotos/data/500/153stonelantern5.jpg
1/4 sec. at f/8 at 22mm using the EFS 18-55
http://www.dphoto.us/forumphotos/data/500/153stonelantern4.jpg
1/20 sec. at f/8 and 35mm using the EFS 18-55
http://www.dphoto.us/forumphotos/data/500/153stonelantern1.jpg
Gary
2 sec. at f/22 and 25mm using the EFS 18-55
http://www.dphoto.us/forumphotos/data/500/153stonelantern5.jpg
1/4 sec. at f/8 at 22mm using the EFS 18-55
http://www.dphoto.us/forumphotos/data/500/153stonelantern4.jpg
1/20 sec. at f/8 and 35mm using the EFS 18-55
http://www.dphoto.us/forumphotos/data/500/153stonelantern1.jpg
hair New OEM Battery for iPod Touch
phillyag
07-17 10:41 PM
I am going to be filing amendment to my previsously filed app. to add my wife.
My lawyer said I can do that.
My lawyer said I can do that.
more...
manderson
03-04 10:47 AM
i think u will be covered under the new NC>180 policy so u can also send a demand letter through your lawyer after March 10, 08 (i am inferring this from updated FAQs for NC>180: pls see that FAQ for more info).
if u want to find out about NC status, call 18003755283. Press
1
2
2
6
1
enter receipt number
1
1
keep listening to updates on case
3
4 you will be connecting to 2nd Level IO
if u want to find out about NC status, call 18003755283. Press
1
2
2
6
1
enter receipt number
1
1
keep listening to updates on case
3
4 you will be connecting to 2nd Level IO
hot Used 64GB iPod Touch - 3rd
justAnotherFile
03-21 01:04 PM
Looking at the responses from admins and core group on the Frist Bill threads it appears that the strategy for IV is to
(i) Send mass faxes to senators to establish IV as a significant org
(ii) Use the above leverage and QGA contacts to try and include additional favourable clauses in the bill while still supporting the bill as is.
The 2 main broad clauses that everyone seems to have consensus on is
(A) Re-instatement of AC-21 (paragraph 5) in full so that oversubscribed countries are eligible to use left-over visas from the rest of the world.
(B) Ability to file I-485 while the visa number is retrogressed.
This thread is to discuss alternatives for these 2 main clauses so that various options can be discussed with Senators if they are not willing to put these clauses as is:
For example:
(A) AC-21 clause alternatives
1. Put in the clause for a limited time period like 5 years, this will relieve the curretn backlog as well as make sure that the immigration per country numbers are not skewed for ever.
2. Increase the per-country limits to 25% so it may be skewed but not that much
3. Increase the per-country to 25% for a limited period of time ( 5 years)
4. Have per country limit 10% on current year only. But for recapture from previous years do not impose per country limit.
(B) Filing I-485 when priority dates not curretn
1. allow for filing if I-140 approved and priority dates stilll not curretn
2. allow for filing of 6 months has passed since I-140 approved and priority dates curretn
3. USCIS favourite :-) allow filing if 45 days has passed since I-140 has been filed and priority dates not curretn.
Pleas pitch in with alternative ideas on these 2 main clauses.
(i) Send mass faxes to senators to establish IV as a significant org
(ii) Use the above leverage and QGA contacts to try and include additional favourable clauses in the bill while still supporting the bill as is.
The 2 main broad clauses that everyone seems to have consensus on is
(A) Re-instatement of AC-21 (paragraph 5) in full so that oversubscribed countries are eligible to use left-over visas from the rest of the world.
(B) Ability to file I-485 while the visa number is retrogressed.
This thread is to discuss alternatives for these 2 main clauses so that various options can be discussed with Senators if they are not willing to put these clauses as is:
For example:
(A) AC-21 clause alternatives
1. Put in the clause for a limited time period like 5 years, this will relieve the curretn backlog as well as make sure that the immigration per country numbers are not skewed for ever.
2. Increase the per-country limits to 25% so it may be skewed but not that much
3. Increase the per-country to 25% for a limited period of time ( 5 years)
4. Have per country limit 10% on current year only. But for recapture from previous years do not impose per country limit.
(B) Filing I-485 when priority dates not curretn
1. allow for filing if I-140 approved and priority dates stilll not curretn
2. allow for filing of 6 months has passed since I-140 approved and priority dates curretn
3. USCIS favourite :-) allow filing if 45 days has passed since I-140 has been filed and priority dates not curretn.
Pleas pitch in with alternative ideas on these 2 main clauses.
more...
house iPod touch 64GB
StarSun
04-22 11:33 AM
We appreciate your past contributions, but cannot give access based on past donations. Will contact you regarding this matter.
tattoo Apple iPod Touch 64GB
arnet
11-21 07:31 PM
check this:
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=15575
also there should be other post, search the forum.
good luck.
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=15575
also there should be other post, search the forum.
good luck.
more...
pictures Apple Ipod Touch 64GB 4TH
bsnf
10-04 09:09 PM
We went there today, got done in 15 mins. Lots of parking space outside the office.
dresses IPod Touch 64gb
dellmunna
04-21 10:52 AM
i am getting less then in my LC but same position.
more...
makeup iPhone and iPod Touch.
bos_guy
08-04 11:19 AM
Anyone know about this situation? Your help will be greatly appreciated
girlfriend APPLE iPod Touch 64GB 4th
H1B-GC
06-18 11:14 AM
Wondering if we need to Pay $80 towards Biometric Fee when Renewing I-131? Paid the Biometric Fee last year when the Travel Document was Applied for the First Time.
hairstyles Apple - iPod Touch 64GB (3rd
a_yaja
06-05 05:02 PM
Just want to know that is there any law
which help to get overtime for full time employee.
I know if you consultant you get paid by hours but not when you become full time employee.
Overtime is paid only if you are a non-exempt employee - usually means you get paid hourly. If you are an exempt employee, then you are not eligible for overtime. Not sure if this is different in different states, but that is how it works in Ohio.
which help to get overtime for full time employee.
I know if you consultant you get paid by hours but not when you become full time employee.
Overtime is paid only if you are a non-exempt employee - usually means you get paid hourly. If you are an exempt employee, then you are not eligible for overtime. Not sure if this is different in different states, but that is how it works in Ohio.
Kevin Sadler
October 3rd, 2006, 03:31 PM
oi antonio! eu gosto do segundo melhor. the skin looks warmer, more natural, and more dramatic. the shadows really work well here. bom job. eu vou estar no brasil em dezembro com a minha namorada, mas nao perto de voce...rj e belo horizonte. eu gostario de conhecerlo um dia... para me ajudar com meu portugues!! :) later, kevin
Blog Feeds
11-16 02:40 AM
As we move closer to an Immigration reform, even government officials agree that such major change is very necessary. Here are some remarks by Secretary Napolitano on Immigration Reform at the Center for American Progress:
Over the past year, as this Administration has pursued more effective strategies within the current laws, the picture of how exactly those laws need to be changed has become clearer than ever before. In the past ten months, we have made tough choices, and implemented significant reforms within the current legal framework�but they are not enough to create the system that we want or that we need. If we are truly going to fix a broken system, Congress will have to act.When it comes to immigration, I took an oath as Secretary of Homeland Security to secure the nation by enforcing the law and managing legal flows across the border. Let me be clear: to do this job as effectively as possible, DHS needs immigration reform.Reform legislation would provide lasting and dedicated resources at our borders, and provide some critical legal tools that we don�t currently have to combat smuggling organizations. For example, we need tougher anti-smuggling laws in dealing with the aggravated crimes smugglers commit�including assaulting law enforcement officers, endangering children, threatening relatives and abandoning people in the desert� hundreds of whom succumb to death from heat and lack of water. We also need to update current laws that don�t cover some of the new means by which criminals conduct their business. For instance, today�s smugglers and drug traffickers often move cash through �stored value� cards, which aren�t even considered monetary instruments under the current money-smuggling laws.In addition, we need improvements to the current law when it comes to interior and worksite enforcement. Dishonest businesses often ignore the civil fines for illegal employment now on the books because they�re so low. It�s also very difficult to prosecute these crimes as felonies because of the over-elaborate intent requirements built into the current statutes.
Read more here... (http://www.dhs.gov/ynews/speeches/sp_1258123461050.shtm)
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2009/11/why_dhs_needs_immigration_refo.html)
Over the past year, as this Administration has pursued more effective strategies within the current laws, the picture of how exactly those laws need to be changed has become clearer than ever before. In the past ten months, we have made tough choices, and implemented significant reforms within the current legal framework�but they are not enough to create the system that we want or that we need. If we are truly going to fix a broken system, Congress will have to act.When it comes to immigration, I took an oath as Secretary of Homeland Security to secure the nation by enforcing the law and managing legal flows across the border. Let me be clear: to do this job as effectively as possible, DHS needs immigration reform.Reform legislation would provide lasting and dedicated resources at our borders, and provide some critical legal tools that we don�t currently have to combat smuggling organizations. For example, we need tougher anti-smuggling laws in dealing with the aggravated crimes smugglers commit�including assaulting law enforcement officers, endangering children, threatening relatives and abandoning people in the desert� hundreds of whom succumb to death from heat and lack of water. We also need to update current laws that don�t cover some of the new means by which criminals conduct their business. For instance, today�s smugglers and drug traffickers often move cash through �stored value� cards, which aren�t even considered monetary instruments under the current money-smuggling laws.In addition, we need improvements to the current law when it comes to interior and worksite enforcement. Dishonest businesses often ignore the civil fines for illegal employment now on the books because they�re so low. It�s also very difficult to prosecute these crimes as felonies because of the over-elaborate intent requirements built into the current statutes.
Read more here... (http://www.dhs.gov/ynews/speeches/sp_1258123461050.shtm)
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2009/11/why_dhs_needs_immigration_refo.html)
No comments:
Post a Comment