gc??
04-23 11:16 AM
Thank you guys. Feel much better.
Glad it is not cancelled with prejudice! Never knew so many terminology associated with immigration.
Glad it is not cancelled with prejudice! Never knew so many terminology associated with immigration.
wallpaper FOR SALE: Navy amp; White Wedding
bobzibub
09-28 03:27 PM
Andrew Sullivan, uber-blogger and one of the country's most influential political pundits warns...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/09/andrew-sullivan-immigration-system-at-a-breaking-point.html)
Unfortunately, the intellectual wing of the Republicans is in hibernation for the foreseeable future. They are basically in hiding from the Glen Beck wing-nuts, so I doubt if Sullivan is very influential right now. He ought to be for conservatives because he is quite insightful but Beck provides plenty of pablum for the lazy.
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/09/andrew-sullivan-immigration-system-at-a-breaking-point.html)
Unfortunately, the intellectual wing of the Republicans is in hibernation for the foreseeable future. They are basically in hiding from the Glen Beck wing-nuts, so I doubt if Sullivan is very influential right now. He ought to be for conservatives because he is quite insightful but Beck provides plenty of pablum for the lazy.
chanduv23
09-25 09:53 AM
If you have not yet joined the Tri State Chapter - do it right now. Follow the link in my signature
2011 White Wedding Lanterns With
factoryman
06-30 02:43 PM
250 words in the body of the thread. It can't be one liners.
That will explain why and what A thread is for. Otherwise, members will be scatching their heads and will show no further interest.
Guys,
since many of us are experts in analyzing data, leets start coming up with qualifiable impacts that can help people respond quickly to ALIF's potential lawsuit
That will explain why and what A thread is for. Otherwise, members will be scatching their heads and will show no further interest.
Guys,
since many of us are experts in analyzing data, leets start coming up with qualifiable impacts that can help people respond quickly to ALIF's potential lawsuit
more...
cool_desi_gc
03-18 06:26 PM
Thats a good set of documents to be sent. You should be all set.
go_guy123
01-21 11:47 AM
Via The Economic Times (http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-by-industry/services/travel/visa-power/us-violated-gats-by-increasing-h1b-l1-visa-fee/articleshow/7232740.cms)
An article in the Economic Times discusses the findings of a think-tank which indicated that the United States may have violated its obligations unde the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) by the newly implemented H and L fee increase for certain US Petitioners, "As a result, a WTO Member whose companies use H-1B and L-1 visas to perform services in the United States may challenge this provision at the World Trade Organization."
Read article (http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-by-industry/services/travel/visa-power/us-violated-gats-by-increasing-h1b-l1-visa-fee/articleshow/7232740.cms)
More... (http://ashwinsharma.com/2011/01/13/us-violated-gats-by-increasing-h1b-l1-visa-fee---via-the-economic-times.aspx?ref=rss)
So other WTO member countries need to challenge based on that.
An article in the Economic Times discusses the findings of a think-tank which indicated that the United States may have violated its obligations unde the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) by the newly implemented H and L fee increase for certain US Petitioners, "As a result, a WTO Member whose companies use H-1B and L-1 visas to perform services in the United States may challenge this provision at the World Trade Organization."
Read article (http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-by-industry/services/travel/visa-power/us-violated-gats-by-increasing-h1b-l1-visa-fee/articleshow/7232740.cms)
More... (http://ashwinsharma.com/2011/01/13/us-violated-gats-by-increasing-h1b-l1-visa-fee---via-the-economic-times.aspx?ref=rss)
So other WTO member countries need to challenge based on that.
more...
Blog Feeds
07-09 12:30 PM
AILA Leadership Has Just Posted the Following:
Senator Sessions cannot leave his hands off of E-Verify. Now in "stealth" mode, Senator Sessions has slyly introduced an E-Verify amendment (SB 1371) during today's full Senate vote on the DHS appropriations bill.
The Sessions amendment calls for a permanent reauthorization of the Basic Pilot/E-Verify program, and mandates its use for all federal contractors and subcontractors - including the verification of all existing employees. This amounts to a massive expansion of a program that is still not ready for prime-time.
We must call our Senators and tell them to oppose this sneak attack by Senator Sessions for the following reasons:
It would impose exorbitant costs on businesses at a time when our economy is most vulnerable:
An economic analysis commissioned by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce
concluded that the net societal costs of the program would be $10 billion a year
� a cost that would be felt disproportionately by small businesses. It would make Basic Pilot/E-Verify permanent without addressing its well documented database inaccuracies:
A 2007 independent evaluation of the program commissioned by DHS found that
the Basic Pilot/E-Verify database �is still not sufficiently up to date� to meet
the requirements for �accurate verification.�
SSA has estimated that if Basic Pilot/E-Verify were to become mandatory and
the databases were not improved, SSA database errors alone could result in 3.6
million workers a year being misidentified as not authorized for employment.
This would result in 6 out of every 100 workers having to visit an SSA office to
correct their records or lose their job.
It would force workers and businesses to pay a high price for Basic Pilot/E-Verify's inaccuracies:
Queries submitted to Basic Pilot/E-Verify by Intel Corporation in 2008 resulted
in nearly 13 percent of all workers being initially flagged as unauthorized for
employment. All of these workers were cleared by Basic Pilot/E-Verify as
work-authorized, but only after �significant investment of time and money�
and �lost productivity.�We urge all AILA members to call their Congressman today and oppose the Sessions amendment (SB 1371). Don't let Senator Session's stealth tactics create a nationwide crisis for employers!
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-5839069238864574507?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/07/there-he-goes-again-sessions-and-e.html)
Senator Sessions cannot leave his hands off of E-Verify. Now in "stealth" mode, Senator Sessions has slyly introduced an E-Verify amendment (SB 1371) during today's full Senate vote on the DHS appropriations bill.
The Sessions amendment calls for a permanent reauthorization of the Basic Pilot/E-Verify program, and mandates its use for all federal contractors and subcontractors - including the verification of all existing employees. This amounts to a massive expansion of a program that is still not ready for prime-time.
We must call our Senators and tell them to oppose this sneak attack by Senator Sessions for the following reasons:
It would impose exorbitant costs on businesses at a time when our economy is most vulnerable:
An economic analysis commissioned by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce
concluded that the net societal costs of the program would be $10 billion a year
� a cost that would be felt disproportionately by small businesses. It would make Basic Pilot/E-Verify permanent without addressing its well documented database inaccuracies:
A 2007 independent evaluation of the program commissioned by DHS found that
the Basic Pilot/E-Verify database �is still not sufficiently up to date� to meet
the requirements for �accurate verification.�
SSA has estimated that if Basic Pilot/E-Verify were to become mandatory and
the databases were not improved, SSA database errors alone could result in 3.6
million workers a year being misidentified as not authorized for employment.
This would result in 6 out of every 100 workers having to visit an SSA office to
correct their records or lose their job.
It would force workers and businesses to pay a high price for Basic Pilot/E-Verify's inaccuracies:
Queries submitted to Basic Pilot/E-Verify by Intel Corporation in 2008 resulted
in nearly 13 percent of all workers being initially flagged as unauthorized for
employment. All of these workers were cleared by Basic Pilot/E-Verify as
work-authorized, but only after �significant investment of time and money�
and �lost productivity.�We urge all AILA members to call their Congressman today and oppose the Sessions amendment (SB 1371). Don't let Senator Session's stealth tactics create a nationwide crisis for employers!
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-5839069238864574507?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/07/there-he-goes-again-sessions-and-e.html)
2010 wedding lanterns coloured.
DallasBlue
09-08 02:09 AM
In the pursuit of happiness...
Join the DC Rally on Sept 18th.
with Presidential elections next year and new govt after that, there
is a greater chance that the legislative reform can happen only now
or after long time, may be like after 3 years. So act now or be
prepared to be in limbo for years ahead.
It is very important that we attened the rally and get ourselves out
of the probationary status that we are in. Probationary status both
in career and family life. The GC wait time could be 10
years if you have a PD of jan 2005 or later. Currently it looks like
we would be in this GC limbo for several more years unless we ACT NOW.
Imagine yourself living with the EAD/AP renewal, cannot really in all
trueness be able to work for and work on what you really want and
what your true potential is. Its just so nightmarish aaggghhh soooo
depressing... to remain in the same job designation and same
salary years ahead... for any person with self-esteem and self-
respect...
Lets get our Life back.
Are you not tired of this probationary life ? if you are tired of
AP/EAD renewals , If you have filed your 485 after 2-3 years of
wait , If you are stuck in FBI name check , if you are tired of
arbitraryness/randomness of USCIS's GC processing and approval...
This is the time to step up and help yourself.
Please step up and save yourself and your family from this waiting
game...
Lets get our American Dream !!
If any of you were/are still on the edge and still contemplating to
join.
Here is a piece of support from the popular law firms Shusterman,
Murthy, Greg Siskind and Oh law.
http://www.shusterman.com/
http://www.murthy.com/a_sep18.html
http://www.immigration-law.com/Archive%20XV.html
http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2007/07/index.html
Let's move ahead from keying-in the computer keyboard with
frustration!! move ahead to get the much needed legislative reform.
This is going to be a histroic rally, be a part of it.
Lets get our American Dream !!
Lets protect our Dream!!
Dare to dream and care to achieve the dream!!
don't Let anyone tell you what not to dream !!
Lets protect our American dream!!
Lets get our American Dream !!
Lets make it happen!!
Lets go to DC to get GC!
Join the DC Rally on Sept 18th.
with Presidential elections next year and new govt after that, there
is a greater chance that the legislative reform can happen only now
or after long time, may be like after 3 years. So act now or be
prepared to be in limbo for years ahead.
It is very important that we attened the rally and get ourselves out
of the probationary status that we are in. Probationary status both
in career and family life. The GC wait time could be 10
years if you have a PD of jan 2005 or later. Currently it looks like
we would be in this GC limbo for several more years unless we ACT NOW.
Imagine yourself living with the EAD/AP renewal, cannot really in all
trueness be able to work for and work on what you really want and
what your true potential is. Its just so nightmarish aaggghhh soooo
depressing... to remain in the same job designation and same
salary years ahead... for any person with self-esteem and self-
respect...
Lets get our Life back.
Are you not tired of this probationary life ? if you are tired of
AP/EAD renewals , If you have filed your 485 after 2-3 years of
wait , If you are stuck in FBI name check , if you are tired of
arbitraryness/randomness of USCIS's GC processing and approval...
This is the time to step up and help yourself.
Please step up and save yourself and your family from this waiting
game...
Lets get our American Dream !!
If any of you were/are still on the edge and still contemplating to
join.
Here is a piece of support from the popular law firms Shusterman,
Murthy, Greg Siskind and Oh law.
http://www.shusterman.com/
http://www.murthy.com/a_sep18.html
http://www.immigration-law.com/Archive%20XV.html
http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2007/07/index.html
Let's move ahead from keying-in the computer keyboard with
frustration!! move ahead to get the much needed legislative reform.
This is going to be a histroic rally, be a part of it.
Lets get our American Dream !!
Lets protect our Dream!!
Dare to dream and care to achieve the dream!!
don't Let anyone tell you what not to dream !!
Lets protect our American dream!!
Lets get our American Dream !!
Lets make it happen!!
Lets go to DC to get GC!
more...
Ann Ruben
03-08 12:46 PM
Either your employer, or the lawyer can contact DOL directly in this situation.
hair of paper lanterns hanging
sweet_jungle
07-27 05:17 PM
Hi,
There seems to be a lot of mixed information about F1-OPT and I-485.
My wife is on a F1 visa. She will be finishing school soon. She also has a pending I-485 linked to my application and an "approved" EAD.
Can she apply for OPT?
I will appreciate if someone can shed light on this.
Thanks.
She can apply , but most probably it will be denied. The I-765 form that will be used will have a question regarding previous employment authorizations applied for. She will have to mention about the EAD. Hence, USCIS will see the person has a pending I-485 and will deny the OPT. It is better not to apply.
The EAD that she has gives all the benefits of OPT. the only risk is she no longer has any backup F1 status if something happens to 485, but there is no way this can be averted.
Only thing you can do is when she works on EAD, ask that company to file H1 whenever possible, which anyway the company would have done if she worked on OPT. That way she will get backup H1 status
There seems to be a lot of mixed information about F1-OPT and I-485.
My wife is on a F1 visa. She will be finishing school soon. She also has a pending I-485 linked to my application and an "approved" EAD.
Can she apply for OPT?
I will appreciate if someone can shed light on this.
Thanks.
She can apply , but most probably it will be denied. The I-765 form that will be used will have a question regarding previous employment authorizations applied for. She will have to mention about the EAD. Hence, USCIS will see the person has a pending I-485 and will deny the OPT. It is better not to apply.
The EAD that she has gives all the benefits of OPT. the only risk is she no longer has any backup F1 status if something happens to 485, but there is no way this can be averted.
Only thing you can do is when she works on EAD, ask that company to file H1 whenever possible, which anyway the company would have done if she worked on OPT. That way she will get backup H1 status
more...
eb3_nepa
05-28 11:20 AM
If you are actually using the EAD you cannot work in the interim though. Just an FYI
hot garden wedding reception,
neeidd
03-01 03:32 PM
Hello Gurus,
I am planning to apply for EAD and AP. Debating myself if I have to go with e-filing or paper based. Some one told me, paper based DOES NOTrequired biometrics where as E-filing DOES need biometrics? Could you please shed some light on this?
Thanks,
Could some one please tell me which one is better and faster (E-filing vs Paper based)?
Thanks in advance
I am planning to apply for EAD and AP. Debating myself if I have to go with e-filing or paper based. Some one told me, paper based DOES NOTrequired biometrics where as E-filing DOES need biometrics? Could you please shed some light on this?
Thanks,
Could some one please tell me which one is better and faster (E-filing vs Paper based)?
Thanks in advance
more...
house Wedding Lanterns in White
pmb76
08-26 12:55 AM
They call EB appointments E2, E3 etc
There are some E2 appointments in the Aug .pdf but not the September.
There are some E2 appointments in the Aug .pdf but not the September.
tattoo 3 Blissful Years | Happy
vkotval
03-27 05:12 PM
I think people on H1/H4 are not eligible for medicare. I think you need to be a permanent residence or citizen to avail medicare benefits.
more...
pictures White wedding lanterns for
sw33t
08-01 06:14 PM
31 members and counting folks.
Join now. We have students, professionals, doctors, lawyers, friends and family in this group.
We have some exciting events including meeting with Senators and businesses to spread the message. If you can talk about your problem, we want you. If you can't, we still want you because all it takes is a flip of a switch to make you talk about your problems.
Join now and don't be left behind.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/texasiv
Join now. We have students, professionals, doctors, lawyers, friends and family in this group.
We have some exciting events including meeting with Senators and businesses to spread the message. If you can talk about your problem, we want you. If you can't, we still want you because all it takes is a flip of a switch to make you talk about your problems.
Join now and don't be left behind.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/texasiv
dresses black wedding lanterns not
lazycis
03-04 10:39 AM
There are no guarantees when you are dealing with the USCIS. I was current in April 2005. Approval came in November 2007. Call the USCIS customer service and initiate service request.
more...
makeup The wedding incorporated large
elusive
10-14 12:31 PM
I went to Toronto , that was august 2008.
1) he just asked which school i studied when I was in F-1
2) who is your employer.
3) why did you leave studies-- I said I got a good opportunity and I am close to finish it soon.
4) he looked into my previous 797 to verify whther I was out of status any time which I was not
5) Then he said the unofortunately you have a very common last name so we he gave the a sheet , kept the original 797 and gave my passport back to me...took 6months before I got email .. went back and got the visa...
I dont know whether I have to go thorugh that issues again when I go for stamping...
1) he just asked which school i studied when I was in F-1
2) who is your employer.
3) why did you leave studies-- I said I got a good opportunity and I am close to finish it soon.
4) he looked into my previous 797 to verify whther I was out of status any time which I was not
5) Then he said the unofortunately you have a very common last name so we he gave the a sheet , kept the original 797 and gave my passport back to me...took 6months before I got email .. went back and got the visa...
I dont know whether I have to go thorugh that issues again when I go for stamping...
girlfriend Mini Lanterns White/Silver
waitingforead
09-03 07:51 PM
Well, my forms were returned to my attorney because of some filing issue. So instead of my EAD as I was expecting I have to refile. Of course I now have a job offer that I would like to take.
My husband (who is a US citizen) is in school and will be depending on my salary. I dont know if that counts as a big financial loss.
Where can I go to find this out. I think my attorney i doing a less than great job in giving me the proper options to choose from.
Any help would be appreciated.
My husband (who is a US citizen) is in school and will be depending on my salary. I dont know if that counts as a big financial loss.
Where can I go to find this out. I think my attorney i doing a less than great job in giving me the proper options to choose from.
Any help would be appreciated.
hairstyles Blue and White Lanterns
aioros
06-14 09:05 PM
oh but that's half the point! i don't wanna hide it, i wanna expose it! :)
gc_in_30_yrs
07-27 06:07 PM
BumbleBee, Thank you for your reply.
I am afraid to talk to any prospective employers as I do not have a copy of I-140 with me. I have a copy of I-140 Approval letter, but it specifies; this copy should not be used as a proof of valid document for official purposes.
I am afraid to talk to any prospective employers as I do not have a copy of I-140 with me. I have a copy of I-140 Approval letter, but it specifies; this copy should not be used as a proof of valid document for official purposes.
msadiqali
05-06 04:23 PM
Stock Markets Gamblers beware..DOW drops 998 points intra day..
No comments:
Post a Comment